Intelligent Design not so Intelligent, Part 2.

"Intelligent design" not science: Vatican paper

Greetings,

I wrote about this before but I had to just revisit this topic by saying a few more things. The Catholic Church won't even support Intelligent Design as a science, that makes me laugh in so many ways. Also a few other little things.

The frame work of ID is put forth in a book,

Pandas and People

. Here is a small quote from Wikipedia, which is true. I saw the first edition of this book myself.

In drafts of the book Of Pandas and People, the word 'creationism' was subsequently changed, almost without exception to intelligent design. The book was published in 1989 and is considered to be the first intelligent design book.

Wikipedia: Intelligent Design

Whoever is trying to get this into schools is not very ethical. They really need to read the bible themselves and try to understand that this is not the way to argue Creationism being deceptive is wrong.

How about just figure out that creationism is religion and not science. Is this such a terrible thing? I am so tired of the ignorant trying to run the country. **cough Pat Robertson** Hey, Pat Robertson is the reason you had colon cancer because god is punishing you for being an asshole?

Until Next Time,
PhantomStar